The be shown that offender has undergone any or

The kids having a relationship with
their folks is critical and imperative. Parenthood focuses on the crucial
building blocks which are essential for mankind to flourish. They act as the
justification for the rights and obligations of parental guardians. In the
parent-child relationship, there are a couple of such interests in play,
including mental prosperity and support of an intimate relationship. However,
the absence of such care routinely has to a great degree antagonistic effects
on the progression and life prospects of a youngster.

Recently, Anytown’s Department of Job
and Family Services implemented new policy focus on any family unit that has at
least one reported offense of domestic violence, drug abuse or alcohol related
crimes committed by parental guardian, will bring about the expulsion of the
youngster from the home. The child will be put being taken care of by the
state, or child care administrations, until the point when documentation can be
shown that offender has undergone any or all of the following programs, and has
thus been “offense free” for a period of no less than six months. The programs
they would have had to attend are alcohol and drug treatment, family therapy, mental health treatment, anger management, life skills classes, and child
parenting classes (Siegel, 2015, p. 122).

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

In
order to address ethical or moral issues that could arise from
implementing this new policy we
would have to look at the effects of parental separation on the child. The
expulsion of a child from their caregiver to whom they are connected, has both
positive and negative viewpoints. From the child services point of view, removing
a child from their parents or caregivers has a few advantages, the strongest
advantage is the wellbeing of the kid. A separation would, allow guidelines to
be established to monitor parental conduct, and the youngster may
get the message that society will ensure him or her, regardless of whether the
parent won’t. A partition of parent and child would briefly liberate the guardians
from the weight of raising kid, enabling them to concentrate on the essential improvements
that’s required for the youngster to return home. Isolating a parent and child can
likewise have significantly negative impacts. Notwithstanding research has
shown that expelling
youngsters from their homes interferes with their growth. The more horrible the separation,
there is greater probability the child would have significant
developmental issues (“Effects of Separation on Young Children:
Implications for Family Court Decision Making”, 2018). Repeatedly removing the child from their parents interferes with the youngster’s
capacity and ability to have intimate relationships. Youngsters who have
experienced awful partitions their folks may likewise show low confidence, a
general doubt of others, immaturity and lacking social aptitude.  

The behavioral reactions of kids who witness
aggressive behavior at home, they may acting out, be withdrawal, or anxiousness
to please. The kids may show nervousness and have a limited attention spans,
which may bring about poor school grades and participation. They may likewise
utilize violence to communicate with friends or parents (“Effects of Domestic Violence on Children”, 2018).  The long term effects of living aggressive or
violence household would lead to drug or alcohol abuse, and adolescent
delinquency. Their juvenile delinquency could lead to more serious crimes as they
transcend to adulthood. According to research conducted by National Center for Post-traumatic stress disorder or (PTSD) more than 33% of young ladies and young men cross the
nation over ages 10 to 16 years are casualties of direct violence. Includes attempted
kidnapping, physical abuse, rape or sexual abuse. Considerably more children
have confronted community violence. That is, they have seen violence or they
know a victims of community violence.  In
one study, more than 75% of children in a high-violence urban neighborhoods reported
coming into contact with community violence. Of note, majority of t the parents said that their children had not been exposed
to violence in the community (“Community Violence: Effects on
Children and Teens – PTSD: National Center for PTSD”, 2018).  I
can see an incentive to want remove children from hostile environments whether
it’s in their parents’ home or the communities they live in. However, there are
adverse effects either way. I understand that society has mission to protect
its citizens but sometime implementing certain policy presents more issues then
they solve.

Did the Department of
Job and Family Services misinterpret or misapply the social learning theory
when planning and implementing the policy?  
In order this question I first have to define social learning theory. Social
learning theory is a theory of learning and social conduct which recommends
that new behaviors can be procured by watching and mimicking others. It
expresses that learning is a psychological procedure that happens in a social
setting and can happen absolutely through perception. Notwithstanding the
perception of conduct, happens through the perception of prizes and
disciplines, a procedure known as vicarious fortification. At the point when a
specific conduct is rewarded routinely, it will no doubt endure; on the other
hand, if a specific conduct is continually rebuffed, it will in all probability
halt (Nugent, 2018).  Well as I
would see it, the Department of Jobs and Children services confused the Social
Learning Theory. This theory doesn’t just simply cover bad behaviors learned at
home. It covers things that are found out through watching acquaintances, TV, video
games, or any type of conduct depicting violence behavior being is compensated.
I think that Department of Jobs and Children Service had just great
expectations while executing this strategy. However, they hadn’t measured the
negatives against the couple of positives, if they did then would have seen
this policy isn’t ideal. There are a few positives that can originate from this
strategy, for example, removing children that are living to really hazardous
home conditions, however that isn’t what the Social Learning Theory is worried
about.