As assuming the IoT is inevitable?” As futuristic as

As discussed by Rick Delgado (2015) in his
article “Obstacles Still Getting in the Way of the Progress of the Internet of
Things,” the Silicon Valley is experiencing some really astounding technological
advancements with regularity these days, and perhaps the Internet of Things
(IoT) has appeared as the most exciting and filled with more potential than any
other area of expansion so far. Experts foresee the integration of IoT in its
full capacity could possibly change our lives for good. People and objects will
be more connected than ever before. Businesses will reap benefits valued at
trillions of dollars in the coming decade across industries. Companies will
make smarter decisions and reduce operational costs. The possibilities are
endless that one could expect by allowing everyday items to communicate with us
and each other over networks, as envisioned by Daniel Newman (2017). That’s the
real charm of an all-connected world.

But, some recent events and discussions
have exposed the IT world to some serious questions like; “is the rush to the
Internet of Things a bit hasty”, and “are we getting ahead of ourselves in
simply assuming the IoT is inevitable?” As futuristic as the IoT seems to be,
nothing about it is a conviction. A lot of difficulties and obstructions are as
yet acting as a burden, a large number of which are very imposing. On the off
chance that we need to perceive any advance in the improvement of the IoT,
these impediments should be rectified and overcome in order to make the most of
this technology.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

As organizations of every kind imaginable
make new gadgets planned for the Internet of Things, one staying point has
turned out to be progressively certain: there is a critical absence of uniform standards
(Perala, 2017). In the event that the entire thought behind the IoT is to make
a world where everything can communicate with each other, this hindrance is
maybe one of the greatest obstructions of all. With technology as powerful as
IoT, it is mandatory to standardize legal rights surrounding access, privacy,
ownership, and everything in between to protect the consumers and businesses from
the outcomes of living in such a connected world (Newman, 2017). For instance,
if an organization that creates brilliant attire is not on the same page with
an organization that creates shrewd home innovation, the odds of their items
imparting are insignificant. That is on account of various gadgets will
regularly utilize distinctive protocols of communication, bringing about an
absence of interoperability and an affair that is a long way from consistent
for clients. This calls for standardization of communication protocols that
promote the development of platforms and networks that are inter-connected,
rather than forcing customers to buy into one specific brand. However, the case
for standardization will rely heavily on the values of companies creating the
technology being used in the IoT space.

Understanding the gravity of the issue, the
agenda of this paper is to examine issues related with the Lack of
Standardization in IoT, audit the existing best in class norms to cater the
issue and, propose a workable solution by showing some specialized